Rubric

Find Rubric
Source Evaluation Essay Rubric
Source Evaluation Essay Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Thesis & Evidence
threshold: pts
16 pts
Original, clear, focused, debatable well-supported thesis. Specific examples included for support. Claims for credibility and usefulness are fully developed.
12 pts
Original, debatable, sufficiently supported thesis. Examples included for support. Claims for credibility and usefulness are developed.
8 pts
Identifiable main idea that is generally supported. Some examples included, though potentially vague or abstract. Claims for credibility and usefulness are established but need further development.
4 pts
Identifiable main idea that is not well supported or does not match most of essay content. Some examples provided, but of a vague, abstract nature. Missing claims for either credibility or usefulness.
0 pts
Missing or unsupported thesis. Little to no examples for support. No established claims for either credibility nor usefulness.
pts
16 pts
--
Organization
threshold: pts
16 pts
logical, coherent, unified organization with paragraphs used effectively and clear transitions.
12 pts
coherent organization that might need some rearrangement or further paragraph division; effective transitions
8 pts
generally organized essay flow but not all paragraphs centered around topic idea; some evidence of transitions
4 pts
essay structure impedes effective communication of ideas; little evidence of transitions
0 pts
little or no evidence of essay organization or development. No transitional elements used.
pts
16 pts
--
Research Skills
threshold: pts
16 pts
Balanced, authoritative sources; effectively integrated outside sources. High-quality research is used to provide more insight into primary source being evaluated.
12 pts
Effective, authoritative sources, sufficiently integrated into rest of essay. Research is used to provide more insight into primary source being evaluated.
8 pts
Some sources appropriately used for assignment; source content not well integrated into essay text. Minimal research is used to provide context to primary source being evaluated.
4 pts
Insufficient sources used for assignment and/or sources are of poor quality for academic purposes. Not well integrated into surrounding text. Does not provide any additional research to provide context for source being evaluated.
0 pts
no sources used, or sources used inappropriately/unethically. (This will result in a 0 on the paper.)
pts
16 pts
--
Style, Editing, & Proofreading
threshold: pts
16 pts
Strategically varied sentence structure. Vocabulary is tailored to writing context. No appreciable errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar.
12 pts
Varied sentence structure. Vocabulary is appropriate to writing context. Minor mechanical errors that do not interfere with reader’s understanding.
8 pts
Some sentence variety. Basic vocabulary. Generally well-edited, with one or two consistent patterns of error.
4 pts
Little variety in sentence structure. Basic or inappropriate vocabulary. Grammatical errors may interfere with readers’ understanding.
0 pts
Little to no sentence variety. Frequently inappropriate vocabulary. Little evidence of proofreading; errors impede meaning.
pts
16 pts
--
Audience Appropriateness
threshold: pts
16 pts
Arguments are tailored to meet the needs of the target audience. Counterarguments are anticipated and adequately responded to. Effective level of formality.
12 pts
Arguments are well-founded, but may not fully consider the interests of the target audience. Counterarguments are anticipated. Appropriate level of formality.
8 pts
Arguments don't consider the needs of the target audience. Counterarguments are not fully anticipated. Appropriate formality for writing context, though not always targeted to specific audience.
4 pts
Arguments are not fully developed or fail to meet the needs of the target audience. Lack of appropriate formality.
0 pts
Target audience not considered, and would not be affected by contents presented here. Too informal for context.
pts
16 pts
--
Citations & Formatting
threshold: pts
10 pts
In-text citations and References page follow APA specifications. Pages are formatted using APA standards.
7 pts
In-text citations and References page follow APA specifications, with some small but consistent errors. Pages are formatted using APA standards.
5 pts
In-text citations and References page generally follow APA specifications, with some consistent errors. Pages are formatted using APA standards, possibly with some error.
2 pts
Is missing either in-text citation or References page, or citations do not follow APA guidelines. Page formatting does not follow APA guidelines.
0 pts
No documentation of sources included. (This will result in a 0 on the paper.)
pts
10 pts
--
Length
threshold: pts
10 pts
Essay meets or exceeds 500 minimum words.
5 pts
Essay close to meeting 500 word requirement.
0 pts
Essay significantly short of 500 word requirement.
pts
10 pts
--
Total Points: 100 out of 100