By this point in the module, you should have viewed all of the Critical Thinking/ Logical Fallacies videos, #1-6.
After viewing videos #4-6, think back to your response to the two gentlemen arguing about climate change in the To the Point podcast you listened to for the other assignment. Do you remember examples where one or the other used a logical fallacy, like the Gambler's Fallacy? Can you pinpoint a segment of that podcast that "played the player, not the ball"?
Write a short paragraph (3-5 sentences) that explores how your feelings about the podcast have changed, if at all, after viewing these 3 clips below. Try to come up with an example from either the podcast or elsewhere in your life that illustrates some of the logical problems these videos describe. How can we avoid relying on such logical errors in our upcoming research project?
136626834004/18/201312:59am
Rubric
58
Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.
Submission meets basic assignment tasks. Submission answers all or most questions/tasks fully, but could use further elaboration for clarity. May not be well edited. OR, assignment was submitted past the original deadline and is eligible for a maximum score of 75%.
Submission doesn't meet basic assignment tasks, though attempts a response to the prompt. May not be well edited. May only answer a portion of the questions or be significantly short of length requirements.
Find Rubric
